It’s also an interesting formulation because we just don’t have the choice of continuing down the path of this highly industrialized, highly fossil fuel-dependent food industry, even if we wanted to. Even if we decided that’s what we liked best, we’re going to find we don’t have the fossil fuel to support it. We would find that having a globalized food economy is fraught with risks, as we’re seeing with the current price spikes. And that food security, whether you’re talking about countries or smaller units, is endangered by having the food system we have. A lot of the political instability we’re seeing now is tied to problems with the globalized food system. So the idea that’s it’s working and that we could continue on this path is just not a choice available to us. We have to figure out another way to do it. And to say the only alternative is the tiny artisinal farm is false. There are many ways to do it. All of them involve changing industrial agricultural, however.On a related note, I saw the PBS documentary of his book Botany of Desire today. The movie complimented and even enhanced the book. Usually when I read a book and see the movie, I am disappointed.
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
Big Ag Will Not Work
Michael Pollan is interviewed in the Globe And Mail. I really like this graph.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment